The Wall Street Diet
You like the title? Good…neither do I. But it will be one you won’t soon forget, and hopefully make up for the fact that Bingo has been working non-stop all day and it’s 2:00am. Still, I blog. I blog, man…I BLOG. God, I love me.
Actually I do like this title except for that “Diet” word. Heck, I may even use it one of these days, so paws off all you wanna-be mes out there. Down boy…down…now, fetch. Roll over. Play Scott Peterson dead.
Thanks for pretending you were Spot…that was fun. Next week we’ll do Orangutans.
The Wall Street Diet is what I’d prescribe to each and every one of you. It’s not a ‘diet’, but a theory of dieting that is (naturally) incorporated into the 10-in-10 system of brutal, sheer genius-nifty goody-ness.
Here’s the secret: 8 steps forward, 2 steps back. Repeat. Read on and find out what the hell I’m trying to say, or just leave and go read some utterly depressing news story on MSN.com. Go on. Shoo. Or, like I said, you can read on and learn something that will change your life and stuff…all for free. Gee. What to do?
Here’s what I mean — fat burning is not a consistent process. How we all wish it were, but biology and stuff. It all gets in the way. Damn biology. The only biology I was ever really interested in was Amy Ewell’s. She was my high school sweetheart. Ah, good times. The rest just bored me silly. I’m a swell nutritionist, though.
Don’t ask.
So, yeah…biology gets in the way. Here’s just a few of the ways. I’d tell you all the ways, but I don’t know that and even if I did you’re not paying me to stay up past my bedtime.
First, there’s that wacky stuff called leptin. Leptin injections were popular back when doctors thought they had found the magic fat-loss drug at long last. And, get this — it’s made inside the fat cell itself. Just think of it. That’s like Hitler making bombs that only blow up Arian Nazi Jackoheads. How cool would that have been? Think of all the dollars we would have saved…and France could have continued to sit on their snooty asses and enjoyed the Parisian coffee in peace.
Jed Babbin said it best: Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. For those keeping score, old Jed was a former deputy undersecretary of defense in the first Bush administration. We’re all guessing “former” because he told Bush that he enjoyed “all” facts, not just those about France. Who knows. Who cares. Politicians suck.
Anyway, leptin…groovy stuff. Doesn’t exactly work like the miracle-seeking druggies want you to believe, but it works great in the actual way it was designed to work. As best as I understand this little bugger (read: no one really gets this yet), leptin likes to be around in large amounts. Leptin is the way that your fat stores speak to your brain to let your brain know how much energy is available and, very importantly, what to do with it. It’s a potent little fat-burning machine…most of the time.
You see, leptin also communicates with your noggin whenever fat cells start to shrink. This is yet another evolutionary throwback that, and let’s just call a spade a jack, God really should fix. This is beyond Bingo’s powers. He deals only in love and virgins. Someone get Andy Warhol on the phone and tell him to call God. This really needs a-fixin.
Shrinking fat cells is a ‘good thing’ unless you live in Ethiopia or you’re stranded on an island and you’ve already eaten Rosie O’Donnell. She would tide you over for a good six months, but after that you’d be damn hungry. At that point, leptin would be doing it’s job — telling your brain, “Hey, burn muscle if you have to, but leave this energy storehouse called ‘my fat’ alone…jackohead.” In a horrid twist of metabolic fate, leptin apparently has something to do with fat lass as well. Don’t ask me — I’m pretty clueless about the whole deal, but I’m sure I’ll feel better tomorrow after sleep and coffee. Just run with me — it’s important for both fat burning and not-so-friendly when it comes to burning fat too quickly.
Different people have different leptin “genes”, I’m sure. That’s why some can diet and diet and nothing happens, and others can diet for a year and discard 52 pounds or more of body fat.
There’s another issue, and this is one I know a lot more about (don’t you wish every fitness writer was this honest?…and funny?…and cute?…and modest?) — the hormone called “T4”. This is inactive thyroid that, in people with healthy thyroid processes, is converted into active thyroid (T3) which is used to regulate metabolic functions. No T3, no metabolism to speak of — and that means very little fat burning.
Call God again Andy. T4 shuts down faster than an internet cafe in Amishtown when calories are restricted for long periods of time. Once that happens, your body temperature drops, often by several degrees.
Keep in mind that a “calorie” is defined as “a unit of heat.” Ah — that’s why temperature is important. A cheap but effective way of measuring your active metabolic rate is to take your temperature first thing in the morning with an old-style mercury thermometer. Just don’t put it in your mouth.
No, not THERE, either.
Put it under your arm for 10 minutes and lay still. Make sure it’s shaken down and ready to go so you don’t even have to get out of bed to grab it. Monitor your temp for 3 days. If it’s lower than 97.2, you have a problem Kemosabe. You either (a) have a deficient thyroid output to begin with, or (b) have shut down your metabolism due to excessive dieting.
And now, the good news: both of these genetic screw-ups can be corrected, assuming the latter is not a result of a defective thyroid gland. All you need to do is eat more and put on some fat.
“Oh, that’s just lovely BINGO THE MORON…like I’m really going to do THAT!”
Yep, you are. Whether you like it or not in most cases. So, you might as well enjoy it.
Here’s how I do it: 8 steps forward, 2 back. “Steps” are pounds of fat — so I plan on discarding about 8 pounds of body fat and putting back on 2 or so in a 6-week period of time. Miraculously, this works out to be…HEY! 10 in 10. You’d think I planned that or something.
Remember, 10 in 10 doesn’t mean “1 pound per week, every week, without any exceptions.” That’s the overall goal. If you discard two pounds one week and none the next, you’re still cool. Even cooler, discard about 8 pounds or so and then back off your nutrition for a few days. That’s all it takes. Two to four days of eating “loose” will quickly restore T4 levels and trick the body into believing, “Hey, famine is over! This jackass finally moved out of Ethiopia and now lives in a posh New York City penthouse, so I can start hoarding leptin again.”
See how that works? It’s metabolic magic — tricking the defects into working for us.
Besides giving you a bit of a mental break (even though you should, as I do, really enjoy every meal you eat), this mini-diversion restores normal metabolic functions assuming you eat more than you’ve been eating.
I use this time to just add one or two meals a day in that are enjoyable alternative meals. A few slices of pizza here, a burger there, a slice of key lime pie on the side. That sort of junk.
Do this for more than 4-5 days, and you’re hosed. Also, if you struggle with resuming quality nutrition, this system is playing with fire. The cleaner you eat during the 8 pounds down, the easier it is to deal with the 2 pounds up.
For instance, I just had my 2 pounds up. I was right at 9 pounds of body fat discarded and felt that “feeling”…the need to eat and re-set the fat-burning thermostat. I did, for 3.5 days, and that was plenty. I put on about 1.5 pounds of fat and water. I felt ready to resume on Monday night, and resume I did. Now, check it: I was really “craving” sweets on Sunday and Monday…even into Tuesday. I wanted to test my “organic food cured my sweet tooth theory”, so what a better way than this?
Did it work? Hell ya! I haven’t had the slightest urge for sugar from the moment I resumed eating organically. None. Nada. Ziltch.
I’m back on track to discard about 2 pounds by the end of next week, and then continue on to my next 8.
So why is this called The Wall Street Diet? Simple: this is the way investments work. If all you did was gain every day in the market, or every month, you’d buy Bill Gates Christmas presents in a few years. Doesn’t work that way, does it? Nope — up and down, just like Pamela Anderson.
Ratings. Ratings, you perv. Ratings. Her “ratings” are up and down.
And the other thing.
Anyway, up and down…just like burning body fat. The only difference is “down” in the market just flat-out sucks unless you’re a buying man or woman. It can be a ‘good’ thing when it comes to fat-burning. You get a “break”, you get to restore your hormones (T4, leptin, and some other goodies) back to a highly-receptive state, and the pressure of “always gotta lose!” is abandoned.
Give this Wall Street strategy a shot. Just be sure to have an exit strategy. Anything more than 4-5 days should fire off every red alert in your head and call for an immediate intervention, exorcism, or slap in the face by a loved one.
Learn to listen to your body, my friends. You’re in this for life, not for 10 weeks. Would you take 6 pounds of body fat shed for every 8 or 9 weeks — for life? You bet…and if you wouldn’t, go read a book on smart investing. Then apply that same strategy to your nutrition plan. You’ll see the wisdom, along with your abs, in due time. {10}
Archived in Just Jon.
This entry has no entry tags.









Comments (13)
Lissa!!! said:
Mornin sunshine!!!
My body tempurture has always been a bit below normal…like 97.8…you’d never guess since Im hot as hell…lol a bit of Bingo humor….anyway.. Ive always felt that my metabolism was a bit slow…but once I stay on a clean eating plan and a regular training schedule…I can get very good fat loss results.
I agree with your Wall Street Diet…initially I need to stay clean for 3 weeks and get mentally invested befor I can play with junk food.
do you follow the same training schedule when you do you dip, break, diversion?
day3
hugs
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 08:37 AM
Tammy said:
This Wall Street Diet idea is awesome! I feel a tons better about not being ‘perfect’- I was actually telling myself this morning before reading this, that it is “progress not perfection”, so you helped to reinforce this. I understand from how you explain it how it works and it all makes sense. I allowed myself to have a donut this morning as they are free once a week in my building and now I don’t feel guilty or like what is the use of working out now, I have already ruined it. I will remember Wall Street when these thoughts pop in. More reframing…….
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 09:27 AM
Woody said:
Sounds like Zig-zagging to me =)
“Just like you have faith in long-term investments in the market, you must have faith in long-term investments in your body”
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 09:41 AM
Jon Benson said:
Woody:
This is caloric staggering combined with hormonal replenishment— the latter is rarely planned or discussed. The reason for the moniker is for memory. Also, unlike “zig-zagging”, which is typically done weekly (and does work well), this is a much longer ZIG with a tad of ZAG with the ‘intention’ to gain body fat.
During the ZIG, you calorically-stagger…that’s part of MasterMeals to begin with. This is more a a planned “increase” of body fat.
While the principle of zig-zagging is hardly new, blatently telling someone to “put on fat” for metabolic reasons, but only a limited amount for a 4-5 day period, is somewhat unique. Most people who advise ZZ (and this includes me) do so in order to rev up the metabolism. This works, but it stops working for a lot of people after X number of pounds.
All I’m suggesting is that you circumvent the process by stopping it yourself. This ‘conscious’ endeavor really does a number on the noggin, and keeps the subconscious from kicking into starvation thinking.
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 11:43 AM
Jon Benson said:
Lisa:
Yes, I stagger my training as well. Like I said in an earlier blog comment, Vince Gironda used to train 3 weeks on, 1 week off. That’s extreme, but it works great if you’re really pushing it.
I prefer to simply train until my progress “slows” — it never stops. Then I take a week of active rest (walking, etc.) and change my workout routine.
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 01:02 PM
Greg said:
Re: Bingo
I was going to tithe here, but they don’t take PayPal!
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 01:58 PM
Jeanne said:
Bingo,
I really do understand and believe the Wall Street idea. I find that with my family history of diabetes and my sensitivity to sugar, if I do allow myself to relax a bit I have a really hard time getting back on plan. I do well during the day, but the evening is a huge challenge to stay on my meal plan. I relaxed a bit over the weekend and then was ready to get back on plan monday morning. Everything goes well until around 7 p.m… then the evil cravings start. Any helpful Bingo wisdom to eliminate this?
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 02:11 PM
JOE DANJOU said:
Jon,
I’ve been doing this over the past year without knowing it. My deviations from “clean” eating have been due to trips, etc.
This Thanksgiving, my 11 year old son and I spent 5 days in Las Vegas…..we do this every year. For two days, we ride the roller coaster…work the arcades…see the sights and then spend the remainder of the time on a nearby lakebed flying high power rockets.
This time, I had been on Tom Venuto’s carb cycling (that stuff works!) program for about 6 weeks. As good as it is…it started to “get old”…I needed a break and a change in diet.
I had turkey and couple pieces of pie on Thanksgiving and some pizza on another day. The rest of the time, I ate healthy but more calories than usual.
I gained 3 pounds (remember….no work outs during these 5 days). I was saddened but promptly went back to clean eating and my weight training/cardio. Two days later, I had lost a total of 5 pounds! (2 pounds to the good)
I feel totally rejuvenated…my workouts are more intense and my cardio is being done at a higher level. This has happened before but I never realized what was occuring until you explained it.
Thanks!
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 02:48 PM
anna said:
Jon
I just have a little question.
If you are on a 1500 cal a day plan and your protein intake works out to be aroun 124gr. Is this per meal or is this per day because if this is per day then it looks pretty low. would you be able to clarify this for me. I have been reading some articles and got a bit confusing with the calculations.
On Monday I am glad to say that i will be starting a new workout program with a new determination.
Thank you in advance
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 03:30 PM
Jon Benson said:
I’ll post to all a bit later…gotta TRAIN MAN…but this just in, kinda like the New Testament, part II:
GREG IS BINGO’S SON.
Just so you all know.
L. Ron has nothing on me.. : )
Anna: that’s per DAY, and it’s far from low. You don’t need more protein than that on a 1500 kcal nutrition plan. That’s 1/3 of your calories, which is plenty (about 500 cals.) The question is: is 1500 calories enough? How much do you weigh?
1500 cals is okay if you’re about 140 or under.
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 04:50 PM
Bill said:
BINGO YOU’RE a MORON - no wait you’re a f*#$/) genius, I have always wondered how some weeks were going that way only to have the following days be excellent.
So here I was frustrated after losing 60 lbs and hitting a plateau for a long time, I started to get serious again the first week of October and thru divine intervention ( or Tom’s email ) I found 10in10. Hit 8 lbs in 8 weeks. It seems everytime I need help you have the right suggestions in these blogs - BRILLIANT!
Keep up the great work and the Broncos only won in the final score - which at the end of the day is all that counts
Posted on Nov 30, 2005 06:04 PM
Lee said:
Evidently just a few weeks ago the discovery of a “new” fat-related hormone was reported on in a major scientific journal, giving hope and insight to our never-ending quest for a better understanding of our metabolic processes.
I remain confident that we will read about this in a future entry, Your Bloggedness, as our continuing source for unbiased and reliable information, n’est pas?
Posted on Dec 03, 2005 04:21 AM
cybil said:
Ok- quick question- I need to lose about 8#-my carbs are @ 100-200/day, protein @ 75, fat@40 (grams).
I weight train 3-4x/week, cardio 2-3x/week-what does it take for me to really start to see results?
-perplexed & impatient
ps I just began this routine 2 weeks ago and have lost only 2#
Posted on Dec 11, 2005 02:23 PM
Comments are now closed for this entry.